Resumen
Presentación general sobre revisiones de la literatura en tesis doctoral. Visión de las revisiones de la literatura como análisis de investigaciones (no de referencias). Explicación de los principales procedimientos y de las fases principales. Modelos y ejemplos. Uso de matrices y de síntesis narrativas para sintetizar información. Publicación y difusión.
Palabras clave
Revisiones de la literatura, síntesis del conocimiento, revisiones sistemáticas, PRISMA, Framework SALSA, recursos para revisiones de la literatura, tesis doctorales
Leer/descargar la presentación en PDF
Referencias
Aguilera-Cora, E., Lopezosa, C., & Codina, L. (2024). Scopus AI Beta
Functional analysis and cases. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament de Comunicació. (Serie Editorial DigiDoc. DigiDoc Reports).
https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/58658
Aguilera-Cora, E., Fernández-Cavia, J. & Codina, L. (2024). Place branding and sustainable development: a scoping review. Place Brand PublicDipl.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-024-00338-5
Bianchini, S., Müller, M., & Pelletier, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in science: An emerging general method of invention. Research Policy, 51(10), 104604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104604
Bhatia, P. (2023). ChatGPT for academic writing: A game changer or a disruptive tool? Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology, 39(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_84_23
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J. S., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., . . . Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Elsevier. (2023, August 1). Elsevier takes Scopus to the next level with generative AI. https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/elsevier-takes-scopus-to-the-next-level-with-generative-ai
Elsevier. (2024, January, 16). Launch of Scopus AI to Help Researchers Navigate the World of Research. https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/launch-of-scopus-ai-to-help-researchers-navigate-the-world-of-research
Gundersen, O. E., Gil, Y., & Aha, D. W. (2018). On Reproducible AI: Towards Reproducible Research, open Science, and digital scholarship in AI publications. AI Magazine, 39(3), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v39i3.2816
High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019, April 8). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
Kaebnick, G. E., Magnus, D., Kao, A., Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., Dubljević, V., Rentmeester, C. A., Gordijn, B., & Cherry, M. J. (2023). Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 26(4), 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10176-6
Lopezosa, C., & Codina, L. (2023). Probando Bard: así funciona la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa de Google. Anuario Think EPI, 17. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2023.e17a25
Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., & Ferran-Ferrer, N. (2023, February 1). Chat GPT como apoyo a las systematic scoping reviews: integrando la inteligencia artificial con el framework SALSA. http://hdl.handle.net/2445/193691
Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., & Boté-Vericad, JJ. (2023). Testeando ATLAS.ti con OpenAI: hacia un nuevo paradigma para el análisis cualitativo de entrevistas con inteligencia artificial. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament de Comunicació. (Serie Editorial DigiDoc. DigiDoc Reports). https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/56449
Lund, B., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S. R., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750
Tlili, A., Huang, R., Mustafa, M. Y., Zhao, J., Bozkurt, A., XU, L., … Wang, H.(2023). Speaking of transparency: Are all Artificial Intelligence (AI) literature reviews in education transparent?. The Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching (JALT), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.15
UNESCO. (2023, September 8). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research
Whitfield, S., & Hofmann, M. A. (2023). Elicit: AI literature review research assistant. Public Services Quarterly, 19(3), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2023.2224125
World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. (2019). Preliminary study on the ethics of artificial intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367823