La presentación aborda de forma amplia el uso de inteligencia artificial (IA) en tesis doctorales. Presenta la buena praxis del uso de la IA en trabajos académicos.
Describe lo esencial del diseño de prompts para tesis doctorales y ofrece una tipología de prompts con numerosos ejemplos y recursos sobre prompts.
Se presenta una taxonomía de usos de la IA en tesis doctorales, tales como ideación conceptual, síntesis de la evidencia y otros. Presenta las funcionalidades más características de los sistemas de IA generalistas y de los sistemas de IA académicos.
La presentación incluye revisiones detalladas del uso de los principales sistemas de IA generalistas como ChatGPT, Google Gemini y Claude.
Presenta revisiones de parametrización y de uso detallado de los principales sistemas de IA académicos, como Consensus, Undermind y NotebookLM usado con documentos académicos.
Palabras clave
Inteligencia artificial, Tesis doctorales, Trabajos académicos, Síntesis de la evidencia, ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Le Chat Mistral, Consensus, Undermind, NotebookLM.
Leer o descargar la presentación en PDF
Referencias (selección)
Alduais, Ahmed; Qadhi, Saba; Chaaban, Youmen & Majeda Khraisheh (2025) Utilizing Generative AI Responsibly and Ethically for Research Purposes in Higher Education: A Policy Analysis. Serials Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2025.2581429
Bhavsar, D., Duffy, L., Jo, H., Lokker, C., Haynes, R., Iorio, A., Marušić, A., & Ng, J. (2024). Policies on artificial intelligence chatbots among academic publishers: a cross-sectional audit. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 10. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.19.24309148
Bridges, Laurie; Lopezosa, Carlos; Centelles Velilla, Miquel; Ferran-Ferrer, Núria (2025). «Moving towards critical AI literacy in LIS education: a scoping review and syllabi analysis». The Electronic Library, Vol. 43 No. 5 pp. 798–817, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2025-0224
Codina, Lluís (2025a). Ethical and efficient use of artificial intelligence in academic work: Veritas and staggered critical interaction. BiD, 55. https://doi.org/10.1344/BID2025.55.01
Codina, Lluís (2025b). Artificial intelligence systems for knowledge synthesis: Theoretical frameworks and literature reviews [Presentation]. Faculty of Communication, Pompeu Fabra University. http://hdl.handle.net/10230/70242
Codina, Lluís (2025c). Sistemas de inteligencia artificial para la síntesis del conocimiento: marcos teóricos y revisiones de la literatura. http://hdl.handle.net/10230/70242
Crompton, H., & Burke , D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education : The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dongpeng Huang, Nicole Hash, James J. Cummings, Kelsey Prena (2025). Academic cheating with generative AI: Exploring a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, Volume 8, 100424,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100424.
European Commission (2025). Living guidelines on the responsible use of generative AI in research. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. European Commission. Acceso: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/2b6cf7e5-36ac-41cb-aab5-0d32050143dc_en
European University Institute (2024) EUI Guidelines for the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence for Research. EUI. Acceso: https://www.eui.eu/Documents/ServicesAdmin/DeanOfStudies/ResearchEthics/2024.06-Ethics-Commitee-EUI-GENAI-DIGITAL.pdf
Giugliano, Alessandra (2025). When does AI use become plagiarism? A student guide to avoiding academic misconduct. https://www.thesify.ai/blog/when-does-ai-use-become-plagiarism-what-students-need-to-know
Hosseini, M., Resnik, D., & Holmes, K. (2023). The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research ethics, 19, 449 – 465. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449.
Hosseini, M., Rasmussen, L. M., & Resnik, D. B. (2024). Using AI to write scholarly publications. Accountability in Research, 31(7), 715–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535
Huang, C., Zhang, Z., Mao, B., Yao, X. (2023). «An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Ethics. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 799-819, Aug. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2022.3194503.
Kasani, P. H., Cho, K. H., Jang, J.-W., & Yun, C.-H. (2024). Influence of artificial intelligence and chatbots on research integrity and publication ethics. Science Editing. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.323
Kim, S. J. (2024). Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review. Science Editing, 11(2), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.343
Lopezosa, Carlos. (2023). La Inteligencia artificial generativa en la comunicación científica: retos y oportunidades. Revista de Investigación e Innovación en Ciencias de la Salud. 5(1). 1-5. https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.211
Mondal, H., Mondal, S., & Behera, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: Insights from journal publishers’ guidelines. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 16, 56 – 57. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_67_24.
Penabad-Camacho, L., Morera-Castro, M., & Penabad-Camacho, M. A. (2024). Guidelines for the use and reporting of Artificial Intelligence in scientific-academic journals. Revista Electrónica Educare, 28(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.28-S.21028
Resnik, D.B, & Hosseini, M. (2025a). The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool. Ai and Ethics, 5, 1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8
Resnik, D. B., & Hosseini, M. (2025b). Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary? Accountability in Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2481949
Smith, S. M., Tate, M., Freeman, K., Walsh, A., Ballsun-Stanton, B., & Lane, M. (2026). A university framework for the responsible use of generative AI in research. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 48(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2025.2509187
Suchikova, Yana; Tsybuliak, Natalia; A. Teixeira da Silva, Jaime; Nazarovets, Serhii (2025): GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing, Accountability in Research, https://doi.org10.1080/08989621.2025.2544331
Tang, B. L. (2025). AIgiarism is plagiarism: artificial intelligence can (be perceived to) plagiarize and can also be plagiarized. Science Editing, 12(1), 81–83. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.346
Torres-Salinas, Daniel, Arroyo-Machado, Wenceslao (2025). Enseñar e investigar con inteligencia artificial: una llamada a la reflexión. BiD, 54. https://doi.org/10.1344/BID2025.54.01.
UNESCO. (2023, September 8). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research
Veiga, A. da (2025). Ethical guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence-assisted tools in scholarly publishing: a thematic analysis. Science Editing. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.352
Yousaf, M. (2025). Practical Considerations and Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Writing Scientific Manuscripts. ACG Case Reports Journal, 12. https://doi.org/10.14309/crj.0000000000001629